corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 9434

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Jernigan JM, Smith MC, Banahan BF, Juergens JP.
Descriptive analysis of the 15-year product life cycles of a sample of pharmaceutical products
Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing Management 1991; 6:(1):3-36


Abstract:

A description of the 15-year trends of new prescription volumes of a sample of new chemical entity (NCE) drug products introduced from 1963 to 1972, using the product life cycle (PLC) concept, was accomplished by identifying an appropriate sample of new drug products, graphically plotting the new prescription volume of each product as a percentage of the maximum number of new prescriptions attained by each specific drug product over a 15-year period, and assessing the curves visually and determining whether the six PLC curves observed by Cox in a 1963 study are representative and exhaustive in the post-Kefauver 1962 Amendment era. The findings suggest that the classic curve type predominates among new chemical entity drug products introduced between 1963 and 1972. The study reaffirmed the existence of at least 5 of the curves observed by Cox and also revealed an additional curve type, the precycle-cycle combinations. The success of the present study was determined by the verification and identification of the PLC curve types that exist following the 1962 Kefauver-Harris Amendments.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.