corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7536

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Davis TC, Wolf MS, Bass PF 3rd, Thompson JA, Tilson HH, Neuberger M, Parker RM.
Literacy and misunderstanding prescription drug labels.
Ann Intern Med 2006 Dec 19; 145:(12):887-94
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/145/12/887


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Health literacy has increasingly been viewed as a patient safety issue and may contribute to medication errors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients’ abilities to understand and demonstrate instructions found on container labels of common prescription medications.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using in-person, structured interviews.

SETTING: 3 primary care clinics serving mostly indigent populations in Shreveport, Louisiana; Jackson, Michigan; and Chicago, Illinois.

PATIENTS: 395 English-speaking adults waiting to see their providers. Measurement: Correct understanding of instructions on 5 container labels; demonstration of 1 label’s dosage instructions.

RESULTS: Correct understanding of the 5 labels ranged from 67.1% to 91.1%. Patients reading at or below the sixth-grade level (low literacy) were less able to understand all 5 label instructions. Although 70.7% of patients with low literacy correctly stated the instructions, “Take two tablets by mouth twice daily,” only 34.7% could demonstrate the number of pills to be taken daily. After potential confounding variables were controlled for, low (adjusted relative risk, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.26 to 4.28]) and marginal (adjusted relative risk, 1.94 [CI, 1.14 to 3.27]) literacy were significantly associated with misunderstanding. Taking a greater number of prescription medications was also statistically significantly associated with misunderstanding (adjusted relative risk, 2.98 [CI, 1.40 to 6.34] for > or =5 medications).

LIMITATIONS: The study sample was at high risk for poor health literacy and outcomes. Most participants were women, and all spoke English. The authors did not examine the association between misunderstanding and medication error or evaluate patients’ actual prescription drug-taking behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Lower literacy and a greater number of prescription medications were independently associated with misunderstanding the instructions on prescription medication labels.

Keywords:
Publication Types: Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. MeSH Terms: Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Comprehension* Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Labeling* Educational Status* Female Humans Illinois Louisiana Male Medication Errors Michigan Middle Aged Poverty Prescriptions, Drug* Risk Factors


Notes:

Free full text

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909