corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7252

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

JNJ: New Labelling Could Reduce Tylenol Sales
Yahoo Finance 2006 Dec 21
http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/061221/22806_id.html?.v=1


Abstract:

Johnson & Johnson said that Tylenol sales might drop following new FDA labeling regulations for the OTC analgesic. Tylenol labels will be required to to warn patients about the risk of liver damage when taken in high doses or with alcohol. Previously, the drug had been considered safer than its competitors Advil (ibuprofen) and aspirin, especially after the FDA determined that they might have the same cardiovascular risks as Vioxx. Tylenol sales increased about 10% in 2005 from the previous year. The new labeling will also affect generic forms of acetaminophen, Tylenol’s main ingredient. Analysts are still not sure how the new labeling will affect Tylenol sales. McNeil Consumer Healthcare, the JNJ subsidiary that markets Tylenol, was responsible for $2.1 billion of company’s overall $47 billion in 2004 sales. Therefore, analysts don’t expect a sales drop to dramatically impact JNJ’s performance.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963