corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 7200

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Judge slashes damages in Vioxx case: Jury had awarded family of 71-year-old Texas man $32 million but judge cuts that by about three-quarters.
CNN Money 2006 Dec 21
http://money.cnn.com/2006/12/21/news/companies/bc.merck.vioxx.texas2.reut/index.htm?source=yahoo_quote


Abstract:

A Texas judge slashed a jury award against Merck & Co. to about $8.7 million over its withdrawn Vioxx painkiller, according to documents provided Thursday by the company.

A jury in Starr County, Texas had awarded $32 million in April to the family of a 71-year-old man, Leonel Garza, who had taken the drug. A judgment by Judge Alex Gabert entered Dec. 21 reduced the punitive damages in the case, pursuant to state limits, according to the documents.

Garza died in 2001 after taking Vioxx less than a month for arthritis.

“The Garza family is very pleased that judge Gabert has entered a judgment based upon the jury verdict in accordance with the law,” said Kathryn Snapka, co-lead counsel for the Garza family.

Merck intends to file a motion for a new trial based on the evidence the company said it uncovered of an improper financial relationship between the plaintiff and one of the jurors, said Tilden Katz, a spokeswoman for Merck’s outside legal counsel.

Merck is facing more than 27,000 lawsuits from people who claim to have been harmed by the once $2.5 billion-a-year drug. Vioxx was pulled off the market in September 2004 after a study showed it doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients taking it for at least 18 months.

The New Jersey-based drugmaker has insisted it will fight each lawsuit case by case, rather than submit to any kind of broad settlement agreement.

Of the Vioxx trials that have reached a jury verdict thus far, Merck has won eight and lost four. An additional Merck victory in New Jersey was overturned by the judge and will be retried.

A Los Angeles jury was also mulling a decision Friday involving two plaintiffs whose Vioxx cases had been tried together.

Shares of Merck ended little changed on the New York Stock Exchange. Rival Pfizer (Charts) saw its stock fall about 0.5 percent, Eli Lilly sank 1.1 percent, and Schering-Plough (Charts) lost 0.7 percent. Bristol-Myers bucked the trend and rose 1.1 percent.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.