corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4166

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Anderson J, Felson DT, Meenan RF.
Secular changes in published clinical trials of second-line agents in rheumatoid arthritis
Arthritis and Rheumatism 1991; 34:1304-1309


Abstract:

The present investigation was undertaken to explore changes over time in the design and reporting of trials of second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis, in the characteristics of patients included in the trials, and in the sources of funding. We studied 105 trials of second-line agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, including placebo-controlled and comparative trials involving 8 different agents. Three time periods, 1945-1969, 1970-1979, and 1980-1989, were compared. We found little change in the standards for reporting on the design of trials or for
reporting information on patient dropout and drug side effects, some increase in the complexity of the statistical methods used, but no increase in the use of power analysis (reported in only 13% of trials). The average age of patients in clinical trials has increased. In recent years, there has been a substantial shift from placebo-controlled to comparative trials, and it is increasingly common for trials to be financially supported by pharmaceutical companies. The consequences of the increasing frequency of pharamceutical company support for clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis are unknown. We did no find any difference in the qualitiative standards of these studiese compared with non-drug company funded studies. Patient characteristics in the drug company funded and non-drug company funded studies were similar. The possible effects of secular trends should be considered when combining or comparing results of trials conducted in different years.

Keywords:
*systematic review/arthritis/ drug company sponsored research/ reporting of results/SPONSORSHIP: RESEARCH

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend