corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 4118

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Information or communication? A consumer study of television advertising
Taylor Nelson Research 1990;


Abstract:

Groups of consumers were shown different versions of television ads for two over-the-counter medications: one with the full label text, one with the simple text and one with no additional text. Full text ads were more likely to be described as unclear, complicated, confusing and with too much information. There is some evidence to suggest that the presence of the full text will lead some people to assume they are experts about medicines and therefore take them more readily perhaps without reading the label. On-the-other hand, some people may take more care as a result of the presence of the text, but the benefits of this are likely to be outweighed by the potential disadvantages. The “Always Read the Label” text encourages people to do so and reinforces such behaviour by indicating how important it is.

Keywords:
*controlled trial/United Kingdom/DTCA/ direct-to-consumer advertising/ over-the-counter medications/ quality of information/ labeling/ broadcast advertisements/ general public and consumers/ consumer behaviour & knowledge/ATTITUDES REGARDING PROMOTION: CONSUMERS/PATIENTS/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING/INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/PROMOTION AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION: CONSUMERS AND PATIENTS/PROMOTION IN SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC AREAS: OTC MEDICATIONS

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.