corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3466

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Spitzer WO, Hutchinson T, Lane D.
Postmarketing management of drug use: toward rational public policy.
CMAJ 1987 May 15; 136:(10):1022-4


Abstract:

A conference on public health issues in the use of drugs reached the conclusion that the topic is sufficiently broad that it justifies a whole new concept that was labeled postmarketing management of drug use. Postmarketing management decisions should always be preceded by the scientific assessment of their likely health effects and this assessment should takeplace in an environment as free from political pressures as possible. Rather than banning drugs, agencies concerned with postmarketing management should instead carry out programs that promote the use of available agents in the most effective possible ways and discourage their use when they are contraindicated for particular patient populations. One of the criticisms of the process and its conclusions was that it was unbalanced. No active members of national regulatory or monitoring agencies participated in the proceedings whereas the conference was funded by seven pharmaceutical companies who sent representatives who participated in its deliberations. There was also nothing said of the responsibility of industry for its actions in making drugs available, educating prescribers about their proper use, gathering information about risks and benefits and deciding whether to withdraw drugs from the market.

Keywords:
*editorial/ postmarketing research/ regulatory authorities/ safety & risk information/ drug company sponsored guidelines/PROMOTION DISGUISED: PHYSICIAN EDUCATION MATERIAL AND GUIDELINES Canada Evaluation Studies* Humans Pharmaceutical Preparations* Product Surveillance, Postmarketing*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963