corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2090

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hemminki E, McPherson K.
Value of drug-licensing documents in studying the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular disease.
Lancet 2000 Feb 12; 355:(9203):566-9
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673699034327


Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In a previous study of pooled data from published trials, we found no evidence to support the claim that postmenopausal hormone therapy (PHT) is associated with a decrease in cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to see whether reports of clinical trials attached to drug-licensing applications in Finland could be obtained for scientific purposes, whether they are useful for studying cardiovascular events resulting from PHT, and if so, whether these unpublished reports corroborate the results of published reports.

METHODS: Since clinical trials in drug-licensing documents are confidential, we had to obtain special permission from the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health to use the data for research purposes. After permission was granted, we studied the clinical sections of licensing documents for PHT drugs sent by drug companies to the Finnish Drug Agency. We aimed to identify trials that compared PHT and a placebo (or no therapy, or vitamin-mineral drugs), and that reported on cardiovascular and thromboembolic events or superficial phlebitis. New trials were identified and their data were pooled with those of published trials.

FINDINGS: 17 licensing applications for drugs used as PHT were found. The number, type, and quality of reporting of clinical trials varied widely between applications. The trials and their reporting of unanticipated adverse events were mostly inadequate. Six new trials (ie, those fulfilling the inclusion criteria and not included in our earlier report) were found. The new trials added little to the conclusions of previously published studies: the calculated odds ratios of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events for women taking PHT versus those not taking it was 1.97 (95% CI 0.84-4.63), compared with 1.65 (0.65-4.21) in our previous study.

INTERPRETATION: In this case, unpublished trials added only a little to the data available from published trials, mainly due to the type of clinical data used in the licensing applications. The new data did not change the previous conclusion that clinical trials do not support a beneficial effect of PHT on cardiovascular diseases.

Keywords:
MeSH Terms: Adult Aged Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control* Clinical Trials Data Collection/methods Drug Approval* Female Finland Hormone Replacement Therapy*/adverse effects Humans Middle Aged Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
See:
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.