corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20488

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Miller C
Doctors hit drug firms over ads
The Herald and Weeky Times 1990 Jan 31


Full text:

A doctors’ watchdog group today stepped up its campaign against companies which promote prescription drugs with alleged misleading or unjustified advertising.

The Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing has decided to attack 15 major drug companies which it alleges have not been able to support claims made in ads.

MLAM secretary Dr Peter Mansfield, based in Adelaide, said a new round of pressures would be directed at the international companies to start hitting at their profits.

“Some of the drug ads and marketing practices cannot be justified – it comes down to a matter of greed,” Dr Mansfield said. N

“Doctors will stop prescribing drugs of companies which are seen to be promoting drugs irresponsibly.

The medical media and notifying doctors of breaches in drug promotions are the best way to make these companies more responsible and responsive”.

Twelve of the 15 companies on Dr Mansfield’s “hit list” have parent companies or subsidiaries based in Australia.

Of the 26 drug companies which had received complaints from MLAM, only five showed any improvement in marketing practices, he said.

Dr Mansfield said MLAM had been so successful over the past six years in pressuring companies to stop misleading advertising, that doctors in or, Dr Mansfield’s “hit list” other countries approached him to set up international branches of MLAM.

MLAM has published many articles on misleading international drug promotions, including five in the influential medical journal. The Lancet.

The Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Association, the umbrella group for pharmaceutical companies, said that MLAM was dealing with complaints from overseas which did not reflect on Australian practices.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963