corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19362

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Grogan K
AstraZeneca settles Seroquel multi-state marketing probe
Pharma Times 2011 Mar 11
http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/11-03-11/AstraZeneca_settles_Seroquel_multi-state_marketing_probe.aspx


Full text:

AstraZeneca is paying out $68.5 million to settle a lawsuit in the USA based on allegations the company “deceptively marketed” its antipsychotic Seroquel.

The deal, which covers 36 states and the District of Columbia, was announced by New Jersey Attorney General Paula Dow, was described as “the largest-ever multi-state, consumer-protection-based pharmaceutical settlement”. AstraZeneca was accused of engaging in unfair and misleading practices when it marketed Seroquel (quetiapine) for unapproved or off-label uses, such as Alzheimer’s Disease and dementia, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and post traumatic stress disorder.

The complaint also alleged that AstraZeneca failed to adequately disclose the potential side effects of Seroquel and withheld negative information contained in scientific studies regarding its safety and efficacy.The Anglo-Swedish drugmaker vehemently denies any wrongdoing but believes that settling this type of case makes sense practically, reducing the distractions of legal battles across the Atlantic.

As part of the settlement, which follows a three-year investigation, AstraZeneca will publicly post its payments to physicians on a website and put policies in place to ensure financial incentives are not given to sales personnel for off-label marketing. AG Dow claimed that the case “sends a message that we take seriously the duty pharmaceutical companies have to supply clear, accurate and complete information about their products” and to market them “without deception or misleading claims.”

Links
www.astrazeneca.com
www.nj.gov

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963