corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17247

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Kawczak S, Carey W, Lopez R, Jackman D
The Effect of Industry Support on Participants' Perceptions of Bias in Continuing Medical Education
Academic Medicine 2010 Jan; 85:(1):80-84
http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Abstract/2010/01000/The_Effect_of_Industry_Support_on_Participants_.26.aspx


Abstract:

Purpose: To obtain prospective evidence of whether industry support of continuing medical education (CME) affects perceptions of commercial bias in CME activities.

Method: The authors analyzed information from the CME activity database (346 CME activities of numerous types; 95,429 participants in 2007) of a large, multispecialty academic medical center to determine whether a relationship existed among the degree of perceived bias, the type of CME activity, and the presence or absence of commercial support.

Results: Participants per activity ranged from 1 to 3,080 (median: 276). When asked the yes/no question, “Overall, was this activity satisfactorily free from commercial bias?” 97.3% to 99.2% (mean: 98.4%) of participants answered “yes.” In responding on a four-point scale to the request, “Please rate the degree to which this activity met the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education requirement that CME activities must be free of commercial bias for or against a specific product,” 95.8% to 99.3% (mean: 97.2%) of participants answered “excellent” or “good.” When analyzed by type of funding relative to commercial support-none (149), single source (79), or multiple source (118)-activities were deemed to be free of commercial bias by 98% (95% CI: 97.3, 98.8), 98.5% (97.5, 99.5), and 98.3% (97.4, 99.1) of participants, respectively. None of the comparisons showed statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: This large, prospective analysis found no evidence that commercial support results in perceived bias in CME activities. Bias level seem quite low for all types of CME activities and is not significantly higher when commercial support is present.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend