corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17057

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Iskowitz M
Pfizer nearly doubles amount spent on e-detailing
Medical Marketing & Media 2009 01 19
http://www.mmm-online.com/pfizer-nearly-doubles-amount-spent-on-e-detailing/article/161727/


Full text:

Pfizer increased its spending on online professional promotion by more than 90% last year, according to a study, a sign the drugmaker is emphasizing alternatives to live sales reps for detailing certain products.

Among all drug companies, Pfizer accounted for the second-highest amount of e-marketing to healthcare providers: $27 million through the first 11 months of the year. That’s a 93% increase over the $14 million it spent during the first 11 months of 2008, according to a study from marketing-research firm SDI.

Leading the firm’s spending were Alzheimer’s drug Aricept ($3.6 million through November, vs. $316,000 during the first 11 months of 2008), pain drug Celebrex ($3.2 million vs. $803,000) and antibiotic Zyvox ($2.8 million vs. $642,000).

The stats reflect spending on e-detailing, online events and virtual detailing-measured collectively as part of SDI’s monthly ePromotions Audit-and suggest Pfizer is “putting some money against those products, at least in this channel,” said Melissa Leonhauser, SDI director of strategic marketing.

When it comes to which of Pfizer’s products draw the most media spend, Aricept, Celebrex and Zyvox aren’t the usual suspects. The company spends hundreds of millions marketing drugs like Lipitor and Lyrica to consumers, yet on these two drugs it dialed back ePromotion.

Lipitor was #4, with online promotion to docs falling 6% to $2.0 million through the first 11 months of 2009 (vs. $2.2 million during the prior year’s first 11 months), while #5 Lyrica saw a 48% drop in online spend to $2.8 million (vs. $3.8 million during the first 11 months of 2008).

As more healthcare facilities erect gates between physicians and pharma sales reps, industry is increasing use of web-based detailing. Through the first 11 months of 2009, overall drug industry spend increased 7% to $477 million, from $447 million during the prior year’s first 11 months.

It’s the ninth straight year in which spending for this channel has risen and reflects increased investment as well as an increase in the number of companies using it to access busy healthcare providers, SDI said.

Another possible attraction for marketers, according to Leonhauser: “In ePromotion you have extreme control over the message. You’re not putting it in a sales reps’ hands to discuss; it’s the exact message you want to come across.”

That’s important to a company like Pfizer. Last year it paid a record $2.3 billion to settle government charges that it improperly marketed certain products for off-label uses, among them Zyvox. Among the ways the government said Pfizer salespeople conducted off-label promotion were improper distribution of samples and handling of doctors’ medical questions.

Among other firms, Merck cut its ePromotion investment last year but continues to lead Big Pharma, per the report. For the first 11 months of 2009, the big drugmaker spent $62 million, down 21% from the January-to-November 2008 spending level of $78 million.

Top Merck products advertised through this channel: Singulair ($17.5 million vs. $25.6 million, down 32% YTD Nov.), Januvia ($10.8 million vs. $11.3 million, down 4%), and Vytorin ($9.4 million vs. $8.8 million, up 7%).

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909