corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17026

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Silverman E
GAO Finds ‘Extraordinary’ Drug Price Hikes
Pharmalot 2010 Jan 12
http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/01/gao-finds-extraordinary-drug-price-hikes/#more-20841


Full text:

Between 2000 and 2008, the prices for 321 different brand-name drugs soared between 100 percent and 499 percent, and the actual number of ‘extraordinary’ price hikes more than doubled each of those years, according to a report issued by the General Accountability Office. More than half were in just three therapeutic classes – central nervous system, anti-infective, and cardiovascular.
Most of the price hikes were for brand-name meds costing less than $25 per unit. Depending on the condition treated and length of treatment, the full cost could total several thousand dollars. A lack of therapeutically equivalent drugs, both generics and other brand-name drugs, may contribute to extraordinary price increases, according to the report. And the limited availability may be due to patent protection and market exclusivity, and the size of the market for a given drug.
Another reason cited – mergers, which reduce competition. For example, the rights to four case-study drugs, which weren’t named, were obtained by a drugmaker, and two of these drugs had an extraordinary price increase shortly after the rights to the drugs were purchased, the GAO found.
The report emerges just as the House and Senate attempt to reconcile versions of health care reform, which has drawn criticism that a deal to win support from the pharmaceutical industry failed to force drugmakers to respond to rising costs (background here). Whether drugmakers will face added pressure to contribute more than the agreed-upon $80 million to fund the bill remains to be seen.
“Another way of viewing this is that an increasing number of companies are recognizing that they have been underpricing their drugs. Given the upward trend in prices of new drugs, re-pricing of older drugs should also be expected,” writes Aidan Hollis, an economics professor at the University of Calgary, in an email. “The government should be asking – what is the mechanism that we can rely on to control drug pricing in an environment with widespread insurance?”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








There is no sin in being wrong. The sin is in our unwillingness to examine our own beliefs, and in believing that our authorities cannot be wrong. Far from creating cynics, such a story is likely to foster a healthy and creative skepticism, which is something quite different from cynicism.”
- Neil Postman in The End of Education