corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16373

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Boseley S
Soaring drugs bill 'threatens to bankrupt NHS'
The Guardian 2009 Aug 29
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/aug/29/nhs-drugs-bill-pharmaceutical-compass


Abstract:

Pressure group calls for regulation to curb prices
• Industry accused of buying medical influence


Full text:

The NHS risks bankruptcy from a soaring drugs bill which is outstripping Britain’s GDP growth, according to a report published today.

The report, by the pressure group Compass, calls for regulation of the pharmaceutical industry to curb prices. The coalition of academics, campaigners and union leaders also warns that the billions spent by big pharma on seminars and conferences gives companies undue influence over doctors.

The report highlights several concerns:

• The drugs bill, which has gone up by £7.5bn since 1991, at a rate faster than GDP growth.

• Lack of innovation. The number of new drugs to treat conditions for which there are no effective remedies has been declining. Between 1993 and 2003 fewer than half the drugs licensed offered a potential improvement on those doctors already use – 152 out of 321.

• The £1.65bn spent annually by pharmaceutical companies on “continuing medical education” – such as conferences and seminars – for doctors, 300 times the Department of Health’s contribution of £4.95m.

The report warns that the industry is in trouble because of a lack of innovation, declining productivity and governments’ increasing reluctance to pay the high costs of drugs.

The pharmaceutical industry risks becoming the next big economic disaster after the banks, the report says, but it is too important to public health to be allowed to fail.

“The argument in this report is that the pharmaceutical industry must be more effectively regulated, so that all stakeholders – the public as well as the private investors – get a better deal. Like housing, transport, gas, electricity and now financial services, some things are too important to be left to the whims of the market,” said Zoe Gannon, research fellow at Compass and the report’s co-author.

“We have learnt from the banking crisis that some things are too important to let fail – the pharmaceutical industry is one of them. The report shows that unless we take action now we are not going to get the lifesaving drugs we need in the future,” said co-author Jon Cruddas, the Labour MP for Dagenham.

“We want to see effective regulation that would stop biased clinical trials and excessive influence over the medical profession. It is now essential that the government steps in. Only through effective regulation can the pharmaceutical industry be saved from its own worst enemy – itself.”

The report raises concerns about the integrity of clinical trials to provide evidence of safety and effectiveness to get a drug licensed for sale. Most are paid for by pharmaceutical companies. “Trials sponsored by the industry have been shown to contain significant bias in favour of the industry sponsor,” says the report. It recommends mandatory disclosure of results – good or bad – within a year of a trial ending, as in the US, with fines and public naming and shaming of those who break the rules. It suggests a national standards committee be set up and supports independent trials in the last stage before licensing, which could be paid for by a levy on the industry.

To reduce industry influence over doctors, Compass suggests measures including declarations at GP surgeries and on websites of gifts and sponsorship doctors have received from drug companies, and the funding of medical education seminars by the taxpayer. Drug reps could be excluded from training hospitals and universities while young doctors are taught how to deal with them.

The industry sponsors more than two-thirds of all medical postgraduate education and information. The bill for continuing medical education is estimated at £1.65bn in the UK, which is just under half what the industry spends on R&D here. Drug companies pay for doctors to fly to conferences, sometimes in Europe but often in the US.

While the rules have got tighter on gifts, so that a doctor can these days barely receive a free pen, they can accept flights, hotel rooms and meals in the interests of attending educational talks and mixing with peers. Conferences are an opportunity for companies to present product data but also for their staff to establish relations with doctors who they hope will prescribe them.At some conferences, such as those for cardiologists where lucrative heart drugs are discussed, pharmaceutical companies hire coaches to ship doctors off to meals en masse at the end of a presentation.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909