corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16194

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Grogan K.
Lilly centres sales around staff with 'deep therapeutic expertise'
Pharma Times 2009 Aug 5
http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=16362


Full text:

Eli Lilly is offering some of its sales reps in the USA an “enhanced severance package” to leave the company as part of a field force restructuring that will see an increased focus on having more specialised staff dealing with doctors.

The company has announced a “voluntary exit programme” for sales professionals in the its diabetes, neuroscience and osteoporosis business units, based on their years of service. Lilly spokesman Ed Sagebiel told PharmaTimes World News that some 4,000 people are eligible “but caps have been set to limit the number of employees who leave Lilly through the VEP to limit disruptions to the business”.

He added that the company is not disclosing specific details “due to the competitive nature of this information”, but the programme will involve only “a few hundred employees”.

The VEP comes in advance of a restructuring of Lilly’s office-based sales organisation in the three units which will begin in mid-November, with a new sales structure taking effect on January 1. This will involve setting up smaller territories, “each with one sales rep who has deep therapeutic expertise”, Mr Sagebiel said.

Currently, the territories “are larger with multiple sales partners”, he added, and the new structure is “designed to help sales reps connect more deeply with customers and increase accountability”. A new “customer engagement model” is being developed by Lilly in Ohio and Wisconsin, based on “creating value for customers as they define it”, is showing promising results, Mr Sagebiel added.

He concluded that the changes “are a direct response to customer feedback”, noting that following “extensive research, physicians they told Lilly that they continue to want a point of contact with the company”. However, they also want to interact with a rep who has a deep knowledge of the therapeutic area in question “and someone who could add more value in their interactions”.

Helps in training scheme for ‘Russian FDA
Meantime, Lilly has linked up with Chao Center and the Parenteral Drug Association to provide training to Rozdravnadzor, the medicines agency within Russia’s Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development, which is considered as the country’s equivalent to the US Food and Drug Administration.

Lilly noted that the goals for the training included improving Rozdravnadzor’s knowledge of current Good Manufacturing Practices, advancing Russian standards for quality control, and “achieving an ongoing international dialogue” between the Moscow-based agency and other regulators on laws and regulations in pharmaceutical operations and inspections.

“Common global standards in pharmaceutical manufacturing are in the best interests of public health and patient safety,” said Frank Deane, president of manufacturing operations at Lilly, and setting up this partnership “is an important step toward achieving these standards”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.