corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14996

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: media release

Experimental breast cancer drug unethically tested on Indian women
WEMOS Foundation 2009 Feb 5
http://www.wemos.nl/en-GB/Content.aspx?type=news&id=3095


Full text:

Amsterdam, 5 February 2009 – People in developing countries run health risks from pharmaceutical companies testing drugs on them for the Western market. An Indian research report published today again shows several pharmaceutical companies’ disregard for ethical rules.

Lapatinib
‘The Indian Centre for Studies in Ethics and Rights has examined, among other things, the way GlaxoSmithKline tested a breast cancer drug on seriously ill women in India,’ says Annelies den Boer of the Dutch Wemos Foundation, co-commissioner of the study with the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO). ‘The drug, lapatinib, has been conditionally approved for the European market by the European Medicines Agency.’

Breast cancer
There are currently around 400,000 Indian women with breast cancer, most of whom cannot afford to pay for the treatment they need. Den Boer says: ‘Participation in the lapatinib trial was practically inevitable since it was the only treatment option available to the women. They just had to accept the risks entailed in an experimental drug. GlaxoSmithKline has taken advantage of their vulnerable position. By now lapatinib is available in India, but most breast cancer patients cannot afford it.’

Tjalling van der Schors, hospital pharmacist and member of a Dutch medical ethics committee, is also critical of the trial, saying it would never have been passed by a Dutch ethics committee. ‘You only give cancer patients experimental treatments if normal protocols no longer work.’

Placebo
Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca also conducted clinical trials in India that are not accepted by ethical review committees in Western Europe. The company gave placebo treatment to patients with schizophrenia. From the report published today it becomes clear that these trials were not required for obtaining marketing authorization in India. Den Boer says: ‘Time after time we see that patients in developing countries are used to test drugs that are primarily intended for the European market. Contrary to the ethical guidelines, these patients do not benefit from the research results. It’s high time for firm action from the European authorities charged with the approval of new medicines and their admission to the European market.’

Campaign
FairDrugs.org, a campaign by a worldwide coalition of health organizations and scientists led by Wemos, starts today. Den Boer says: ‘We’ve issued a call urging policy-makers, regulators and pharmaceutical companies to respect the rights of trial subjects in developing countries. Everyone who signs the call at www.FairDrugs.org is also giving support to our European lobby action.’

————————————————————————————————————————
Press note
Wemos contributes to the structural improvement of people’s health in developing countries. For more information go to www.FairDrugs.org or contact Leontien Laterveer (Wemos): +31 (0)20 – 435 20 62; +31 (0)6 – 10 30 58 90; leontien.laterveer@wemos.nl.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963