corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14726

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

'Old treatments' better for IBS
BBC News 2008 Nov 14
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7727459.stm


Full text:

Older “overlooked” treatments for irritable bowel syndrome may end up being the best option for patients, research suggests.
Fibre, anti-spasmodic drugs and peppermint oil were all found to be effective in a review of the evidence.
Guidelines on IBS should be updated in light of the findings, the researchers say in the British Medical Journal.
A UK expert said there had been a general feeling among doctors that the therapies “didn’t work”.
Between 5% and 20% of the population is estimated to suffer from IBS which is characterised by abdominal pain and an irregular bowel habit.

This puts these simple remedies back on the agenda Professor Roger Jones, King’s College London The exact cause of the condition is unknown and recommendations for treatment include dietary advice, antidepressants and alternative therapies. Fibre, antispasmodics and peppermint oil are used to treat IBS, but evidence of their effectiveness is unclear because of conflicting results from studies, the researchers said. They have also been overlooked because of the focus on newer more expensive drugs which ended up being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy and safety concerns, they added. Benefits By trawling through all the studies comparing the therapies with dummy pills or no treatment, the researchers were able to look at data from 2,500 adult patients with IBS. Fibre, antispasmodics and peppermint oil were all found to be effective, with doctors needing to treat 11, 5 and 2.5 patients, respectively for one patient to benefit. Insoluble fibre such as bran was not beneficial; only isphaghula husk – a soluble form of fibre – significantly reduced symptoms. Hyoscine – extracted from the cork wood tree – was the most successful antispasmodic drug looked at and should be the first choice, the researchers said. Out of all three treatments, peppermint oil seemed to come out on top. Both peppermint oil and hyoscine – an antispasmodic not currently widely prescribed in the UK – are available from the pharmacy. Study leader Dr Alex Ford, a gastroenterologist who has recently moved from Canada – where he did the research to St James University Hospital in Leeds – said the treatments were cheap, safe and had been in use for 15 to 20 years. “They fell out of favour with the development of new drugs. “This is good news for patients.” Professor Roger Jones, head of the Department of General Practice at Kings College London, and founding president of the Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology, said: “There is a general feeling that they don’t work very well. “With all of the treatments for IBS, there is a huge placebo effect so it is easy to imagine your treatment is working then the trials come along and suggest they don’t. “This puts these simple remedies back on the agenda.” He added that the study did not pick out which patients would benefit from which treatment but as they are safe and cheap, patients can test what works best for them.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963