corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 14480

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dobson R.
Atorvastatin advertising misled over benefits for women, study claims
BMJ 2008 Oct 22; 337:a2209 epub ahead of print
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/337/oct22_1/a2209?papetoc


Abstract:

Advertising of the world’s best selling drug failed to disclose the absence of benefits for women, who should be entitled to compensation to recoup the costs of treatment, claim experts in epidemiology and law in a new analysis.

They argue that unqualified claims of protection against heart attacks made in advertisements for the lipid lowering drug atorvastatin (which is made by Pfizer and sold as Lipitor) may be misleading and that the advertising raises concerns about the way the US Food and Drug Administration regulates drugs (Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2008;5:507-50, doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00132.x)

The authors, Theodore Eisenberg, a professor of law at Cornell Law School, and Martin Wells, professor of clinical epidemiology at Cornell University Weill Medical College, claim that a substantial portion of the multibillion dollar market in statins may be made up of users for whom the drugs offer no benefit.

They add that remedies . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.