corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 12609

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Pfizer moves away from centralised online med ed applications
PMLive 2008 Jan 15
http://www.pmlive.com/index.cfm?showArticle=1&ArticleID=6425


Full text:

Pfizer is trying to win back accredited education providers who may have been turned off by Big Pharma’s newer online grant application systems, which currently dominate in the US.

At the same time, however, non-accredited medical education firms will be discouraged from applying directly.

The newer online marketing systems increasingly taken up by pharmaceutical companies have replaced the drug rep in the US, who had been the main point of contact for providers like community hospitals.

In an interview with US-based Medical Media and Marketing, Maureen Doyle-Scharff, a director of the medical education group at Pfizer, said: “These centralised grant systems may have been the right way to go at the time, but they forced large and small providers alike to operate within the same bureaucratic maze.”

“Smaller providers are running a CME programme on a shoestring, and when they’re seeking support, it’s usually not a lot. Local providers have said to me it’s not even worth submitting applications for activities such as grand rounds,” added Doyle-Scharff.

Pfizer, which is of the largest supporters of industry-funded CME in the US, is now offering what it says is a kinder, gentler grant management portal, with user-friendly features built in based on user feedback.

Only accredited providers are able to register and they can be accredited by the Accreditation Council for CME in the US (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) or, in the case of a hospital, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations.

Launched on 4 January, www.pfizermededgrants.com is part of wider activities at the firm to restore funding to community hospitals and state chapters of specialty societies while better targeting grants to areas of greatest need.

The new system requires that individuals applying for grants be the ones responsible for the education. Many accredited MECCs will fall into the category of level-three providers (corresponding to the level of outcomes they can produce), the level which Pfizer wants to support.

However, non-accredited MECCs would need to change their business model to focus more on teaching hospitals, which seek to broaden their competencies through instructional design and medical writing.

Pfizer will begin to phase out so-called capabilities presentations, during which non-accredited MECCs meet with drug companies to showcase their services, Doyle-Scharff concluded.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909