corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism International News

August 2002

AN UNHEALTHY ALLIANCE: A discourse analytic study of General Practitioners and Pharmaceutical…

August - October 2002 Vol 20 No 8-10

AN UNHEALTHY ALLIANCE:

A discourse analytic study of General Practitioners and Pharmaceutical Representatives, Gifts and Samples

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT                                                                    iv

DECLARATION                                                                vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                                       vii

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION                                            1         Pharmaceutical Promotion

1.1.1.      General Overview

1.1.2.      The Influence of Pharmaceutical Promotion on Prescribing

1.2         Medical Ethics

1.3         Ethical Dilemmas


CHAPTER TWO: METHODOLOGY                                        22

2.1         Discourse Analysis

2.2         Collection of Data

2.3         Analysis Procedure

2.4         Methodological Issues

2.5         Analysis Outline

CHAPTER THREE: ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION                      30

3.1         The ‘Business’ Repertoire

        3.2         The ‘Information/Knowledge’ Repertoire

        3.3         Discussion

REFERENCES                                                                  59

APPENDICES:                                                                67

A:        Information Letter                                                    

B:        Consent Form                                                        

C:        Focus Group Information Sheet                                  

D:        Focus Group Questions and Issue Statements                    

E:        Transcript Notation                                                  

F:        MaLAM                                                            

G:        AMA Position Statement: Code of Ethics                        

H:        ‘Business’ Repertoire Extracts                                        

I:        ‘Information/Knowledge’ Repertoire Extracts

 

 

HS Int News index

Page views since 15 March 2010: 3341

 

Comments

Our members can see and make comments on this page.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others. The contents of this page are the author's views and do not necessarily reflect the position of Healthy Skepticism or other members of Healthy Skepticism.

  • E-mail
  • LinkedIn
  • Del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963