corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16779

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Gérvas J, Wright J
Please may we have an RCT now?
BMJ 2009 Nov 10; 339:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/339/nov10_1/b4651?papetoc


Abstract:

Mass vaccination against A/H1N11 is based on several false assumptions:

That the H1N1 pandemic will mimic the Spanish flu pandemic of 1919, although the world in 1919 was very poor without public health systems, tap water, or antibiotics
That H1N1 flu is severe and deadly, although the death rates are much lower than for seasonal flu2 3
That the vaccine will work, although randomised controlled trials of effectiveness are lacking for both H1N1and seasonal flu vaccines
That the H1N1 vaccine will provide similar immunity to the natural infection, in which the first flu virus we are exposed to generates the strongest immune response and lasts for over 50 years,4 although flu vaccines have to be given as one (or two) shots annually to achieve lesser immunity.
H1N1 vaccines need to be tested in a placebo controlled randomised controlled trial.5 Without such an approach, we will still not know whom to vaccinate . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963