corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 8570

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dorsey R.
S 2697: a toxic prescription.
JAMA 1976 Sep 13; 236:(11):1255-8


Abstract:

Reasons for opposition to Senate Bill 2697 are discussed. Passage of this bill would replace the present Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the Drug and Devices Administration (DDA) and endow the DDA with extensive regulatory power not only over the pharmaceutical industry but over drug prescribing by physicians.

Keywords:
Drug Evaluation* Drug Industry Drug Labeling Government Agencies Legislation, Drug* Peer Review Prescriptions, Drug Professional Review Organizations United States United States Food and Drug Administration

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
See:
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.