corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 6455

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Bennett JH.
Separating the wheat from the chaff: identifying fallacies in pharmaceutical promotion.
J Gen Intern Med 1994 Oct; 9:(10):563-8


Abstract:

The authors assume that pharmaceutical promotion is here to stay and that the goal should be to make the targets of such efforts “informed consumers.” They present some of the techniques of influence in terms of the “appeals” that are made and then offer some ways in which health care professionals can prepare themselves to separate the useful information from the useless misinformation that frequently accompanies it.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/influence techniques/gift giving/drug company sponsored meals and travel/doctors/sales representatives/EDUCATING ABOUT PROMOTION: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS/ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: GIFT GIVING/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: DETAILING/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: INFLUENCE TECHNIQUES Advertising* Drug Industry* Humans Logic* Persuasive Communication

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963