corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3992

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

George RA.
Direct drag promotion does not benefit patients.
J Fla Med Assoc 1989 Feb; 76:(2):239-40


Abstract:

A review is given of why physicians have gained the confidence and trust of people. The evolution of the unique relationship and trusted partnership between pharmaceutical companies and physicians is described. The process rightfully goes unchallenged. A position of elevated status (of “ethical” drug companies) has meant, in part that they confine solicitation of their drugs to physicians. Some companies have now departed from this long, successful and special relationship. Direct-to-the-public advertising of prescription drugs has now appeared. A number of questions are raised in opposition to these advertisements, opinions of important organisations are cited. It is asserted that direct-to-the-public advertising can be detrimental, potentially dangerous, and raise the price of medications without bringing corresponding benefits to physicians or patients. Our goals were once similar, our relationship was strong, our efforts to help the sick were admirable, and our successes raised the aspirations of the medical world. Are we still on common ground, or are drug companies now marching downward to the beat of a different drummer called… “The Market?”

Keywords:
*letter to the editor/United States/ Advertising* Drug Industry* Humans Physicians Prescriptions, Drug*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963