corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 3011

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Thompson EL.
Sexual bias in drug advertisements.
Soc Sci Med 1979 Mar; 13A:(2):187-91


Abstract:

This study was based on drug advertisements appaering in two leading American medical journals in 1975. The sex distribution of patients shown in advertisements for drugs for various conditions was compared with the sex distribution of those people who are actually afflicted with these conditions. Sexual bias was found in advertisements for medications for hypertension, anxiety, insomnia, angina, depression, and hyperlipidemia. In each case there were significantly more male patients shown in the advertisements than was warranted. No bias was found in advertisements for drugs for respiratory problems, non-respiratory infections, arthritis and pain.

Keywords:
*content analysis/United States/journal advertisements/images in ads/men/women/sexism/EVALUATION OF PROMOTION: JOURNAL ADVERTISEMENTS/IMAGES IN PROMOTION: MEN/IMAGES IN PROMOTION: WOMEN Advertising* Female Humans Male Periodicals Pharmaceutical Preparations* Sex*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963