corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2894

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Cope JD.
The charges against O-T-C medicine advertising--are they deserved?
J Am Pharm Assoc 1976 Sep; 16:(9):500-4


Abstract:

Advertising, to be effective, must be honest. This is particularly true with nonprescription medicines. This article reviews concerns about OTC drug advertising. OTC drug manufacturers advertise on TV because the market is very competitive. There is concern that OTC advertising may increase illicit drug abuse, particularly by youth. Review of scientific literature does not support this. Another concern is that OTC ads may contribute to unsupervised ingestion of medicine by children. Available data tend to negate this. Another concern is that OTC ads may stimulate artificial demand for nonprescription medicines. Again, data suggest otherwise. The examples of cigarettes and liquor are relevant. Neither are advertised on TV. Yet the nation’s biggest drug problem is alcohol, and cigarette consumption has increased despite the ban on TV ads. Some argue that restrictions of advertising would lead to lower prices for consumers. However, several studies have demonstrated that advertising restrictions prevent competition, thus increasing prices. Advertising restrictions also discourage the entry of new firms and new products to the market. Self-medication plays an important role in the nation’s healthcare system. The Proprietary Association’s Code of Advertising Practices has been strengthened on a number of occasions. While attempts are being made to scapegoat TV advertising, valuable resources are not being spent on determining the real reasons for drug abuse and misuse.

Keywords:
*analysis/United States/Advertising* Costs and Cost Analysis Drugs, Non-Prescription* Humans Substance-Related Disorders United States

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963