Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2256
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
 
Publication type: Journal Article
Jureidini J, Mansfield PR.
Avoiding competing interests
BMJ 2002 Dec 27; 325:(7377):1375
http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/325/7377/1375
Abstract:
We congratulate you for showing leadership for all medical journals by publishing the competing interests of your editors, editorial board, and group executive. However we are concerned that your suggestion that “there isn’t anything wrong in having competing interests†might be taken out of the context provided by your comments about human vulnerability. We agree that there is nothing automatically wrong with competing interests. Even drug company employees can do great research if they take care to minimize bias. However the evidence suggests that competing interests are often harmful and that perceptions of personal invulnerability are a major source of error. As you wrote, “bias is pervasive and acts on us unconsciouslyâ€. Consequently, anyone who claims to be immune from the adverse effects of competing interests should be treated with healthy skepticism. Competing interests vary. We are proud to disclose our interest in advancing Healthy Skepticism Inc (www.healthyskepticism.org). We are not proud to have accepted gifts from drug companies in the past. We now feel that was a mistake. Consequently, we have signed the NoFreeLunch pledge (www.nofreelunch.org) to reduce our dependence on drug companies. Doctors can do better than just declaring competing interests; many competing interests can be avoided altogether.
Keywords:
*letter to the editor
United Kingdom
Australia
relationship between medical profession and industry
conflict-of-interest
declaration of interests
perceived immunity
Healthy Skepticism
NoFreeLunch
ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: GIFT GIVING
ETHICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTION: LINKS BETWEEN HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND INDUSTRY
INFLUENCE OF PROMOTION: PRESCRIBING, DRUG USE