corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20373

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Pippalla RS, Riley DA, Chinburapa V.
Influencing the prescribing behaviour of physicians: a metaevaluation.
J Clin Pharm Ther 1995; 20:(4):189-98
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8557782


Abstract:

Many different interventions have been used to influence the prescribing behaviour of physicians, and qualitative evaluations (metaethnography) of such interventions have been reported. So far quantitative evaluations of such interventions have not been reported; this study is an attempt in that direction. Twenty-six published studies (January 1979-September 1991) on the interventions for influencing the prescribing behaviour of physicians were pooled and effect sizes were extracted. Mean effect size (Zr) was 0.559 and Cohen’s d = 0.886. Estimated Fail-Safe N was 89. Success rates of interventions varied from 1% to 99%.

Keywords:
Behavior Drug Prescriptions*/economics Drug Prescriptions*/standards Humans Physician's Practice Patterns*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.