corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 2034

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Stryer D, Bero LA.
Characteristics of materials distributed by drug companies. An evaluation of appropriateness.
J Gen Intern Med 1996 Oct; 11:(10):575-83


Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To describe material distributed to physicians by pharmaceutical companies; to describe characteristics of the drugs discussed in the material; to determine whether the material complies with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and whether it contains promotional and educational characteristics.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: An academic internal medicine residency program, a private internist’s office, and a health maintenance organization (HMO).

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 486 items, excluding gifts and drug samples, distributed by drug companies between August 11, 1993 and March 1, 1994.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 486 items collected, 207 were reprints, 196 were advertisements, 51 were general information, and 32 were other. Reprints were delivered to residents significantly more often than to the HMO (p < .001) or to the private internist’s office (p < .001). By contrast, the internist’s office received a greater proportion of personal correspondence compared with the other locations (p < .001 for both). Of the drugs publicized, 10] were substantial improvements over other therapeutic choices. Forty-two percent of the items failed to comply with at least one of three FDA regulations assessed, including 17 items that discussed unapproved uses for drugs. Advertisements, as well as items that were not obviously promotional, contained promotional characteristics. Thirty-nine percent of the items offered scientific support for their claims.

CONCLUSIONS: Little of the material distributed by pharmaceutical companies to physicians conveys information about important therapeutic breakthroughs; some of it fails to comply with FDA regulations. The material contains both educational and promotional characteristics.

Keywords:
Publication Types: Review Review, Tutorial MeSH Terms: Advertising Attitude* Conflict of Interest Cross-Sectional Studies Drug Industry*/education Drug Industry*/standards Drug Utilization/trends Government Regulation Humans Information Dissemination* Interprofessional Relations* Sampling Studies United States United States Food and Drug Administration*

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963