corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20282

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Supreme Court asks Centre not to alter pricing system for essential drugs
The Economic Times 2012 Oct 3
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2012-10-03/news/34238803_1_essential-medicines-prices-control-steep-hike


Abstract:

The Supreme Court today asked the government not to alter the existing pricing system for essential medicines, a step which may allegedly lead to a steep hike in their prices.

“We make it clear that the Government should not alter the price system as notified on July 13, 1999 and similar subsequent notification,” said a bench headed by justice G S Singhvi, while granting seven days to the Centre to decide on the pricing of essential medicines.

The bench said it is concerned about the issue and it is needed for the court to intervene into the issue.

“We are directly concerned about it. The court does not run the government, but it steps in only when required,” the bench observed while posting the matter for further hearing on next Tuesday, October 9.

The Centre informed the court that the recommendations, made by the Group of Ministers, will soon be placed before the Cabinet for final decision on the issue.

The court was hearing a public interest litigation plea filed in 2003 by the All India Drugs Action Network and others which had complained that currently only around 78 drugs are placed under the Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO) making rest of the medicines beyond the reach of the common man.

During the last hearing on the matter, the petitioner’s counsel had expressed apprehension that the proposed drug policy may lead to a steep hike in prices of essential drugs.

The apex court on last hearing too had asked the government to ensure that rates do not “escalate” and cause a burden on the common man.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.