corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 20172

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Hansen K
S4 advertising in mainstream press
Australian Medicine 1999 July 53
http://ama.com.au/node/3634


Full text:

Proposals to lift bans on advertising of prescription medicines to the public are being discussed as part of a major review of the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code.

A small task force within the review’s Code Council is drawing up a framework which, if endorsed by the Council, would cover direct-to-consumer advertising of all therapeutic goods, including prescription medicines.

Advertising Schedule 4 items (prescription drugs) direct to the public is prohibited in Australia.

Pharmaceutical Guild of Australia executive pharmacist, Libby Breden, is concerned that while manufacturing groups such as the Australian Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (APMA) and the Proprietary Medicines Association of Australia are on the task of force, there are no medical representatives.

“There has to be considerable consultation with industry bodies”, she said.

APMA chief executive officer, Pat Clear, said the Association would support moves that allowed prescription drugs to be advertised. “Consumers deserve to have the information before them”, he said.

AMA Federal Treasurer, Dr Stephen Phillips, disagreed.

He said direct-to-consumer advertising ‘didn’t achieve anything for patient welfare’.

The public ‘shouldn’t be bombarded with sales messages that take no account of the individual and their particular clinical circumstance’.

APMA representative observing the review, Fiona Woodard, stressed that recommendations for driect-to-consumer advertising of S4 drugs went beyond the scope of the review. However, she said what they were trying to do was establish an appropriate advertising framework ‘just in case’ the law was ever changed. Ms Woodard said the review provided an opportunity to devise a framework that would ensure a level playing field for all medicines.

RACGP representative on the Code Council, Associate Professor Andrea Mant, said she did not like direct-to-consumer advertising but it was important to be prepared for it.

“We can’t live in a dream world and expect it will never happen… We shouldn’t be waiting until it hits us”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963