corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19796

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Collins G
Call to axe starter packs
6minutes 2012 Jan 23
http://www.6minutes.com.au/news/latest-news/call-to-axe-starter-packs


Full text:

Prescription starter packs should be banned and payments to individual
doctors should be made public under a revised pharma industry code of
conduct, Medicines Australia has been told.

In a submission to Medicines Australia’s Code of Conduct review, Sydney
haematologist Professor Ian Kerridge has called for transparency around
pharmaceutical company sponsorship to be brought into line with the US. See:

http://medicinesaustralia.com.au/files/2011/12/Associate-Professor-Ian-Kerridge.pdf

He says that starter packs for GPs should be banned or at least Medicines
Australia should be required to regularly collect and report data on the
“extent, nature and distribution” of the prescription products provided
free to doctors.

And he suggests that the Code should not be supporting Product
Familiarisation Programs.

Associate Professor Kerridge insists that promotional material for new drugs
should make it clear when a product has been approved on the basis of
surrogate end-points during trials, rather than on hard endpoints such as
mortality or morbidity.

And he calls for the Code to ensure all healthcare professionals and
research organisations who receive payments from pharmaceutical companies
publically declare it on the Medicines Australia website.

Professor Kerridge also suggests that the Code should not allow pharma
companies to produce public education material or programs relating to their
own products and that it should provide specific guidance for “disease
awareness” campaigns.

He adds that the fines companies face if they breach the Code are “grossly
inadequate” and fail to provide a genuine disincentive for unethical
behaviour.

Medicines Australia is still accepting submissions for its Code of Conduct
review (link) and the 17th edition of the Code is due to be released in
January 2013.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963