Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19783

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.


Publication type: news

Alexander J
Health ministry asks state drug controllers to closely monitor misleading ads on vitamins, creams
Pharmabiz 2012 Jan 18

Full text:

The union health ministry has asked the state drug control authorities to strictly monitor the exaggerated product advertisements making tall claims regarding efficacy of certain anti-ageing creams, dietary supplements and vitamins.

The direction comes in the wake of complaints lodged with the ministry regarding the ‘significant’ rise in the number of such advertisements about fairness creams, weight loss programmes and vitamins, sources said without specifying any particular advertisement or case.

The state drug control departments were instructed to keep a close tab on such advertisements and file regular reports to the Centre so that further action could be chalked out. “The monitoring will be a continuous activity and based on the inputs, option of further amending the rules would be taken,” sources in the ministry said.

“The regulatory control over manufacture of cosmetics is exercised by the state governments under the provisions of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945. The Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945 were amended in 2009 by inserting rule 148-B which provides prohibition against false and misleading claims for cosmetics. Complaints about tall or unsubstantiated claims are examined by the concerned state authorities under whose jurisdiction the manufacturer is located,” sources said.

The Drugs Consultative Committee (DCC), held in November last year, also had discussed the issue in detail and the drug controllers from the states were alerted on taking stern action on misleading advertisements originating from the states.

As regards the advertisement of food items, Section 24 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 provides for restriction on advertisement of any food which misleads or contravenes the provisions of the Act or the rules and regulations made thereunder. Under Section 53 of the said Act, there is a provision for penalty for misleading advertisement, which makes it liable to a fine which may extend to Rs.10 lakh.


  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Click to Register

(read more)

Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts

If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend

You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.