corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19597

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Media Release

Scientists and NGOs slam Commission's Research funding plans
HAI Europe 2011 Jun 29
http://www.haieurope.org


Full text:

n an open letter sent today to the President and Members of the European Commission as well as the European Parliament and the EU Member states, 98 civil society and research organisations from 22 European countries warn that the Commission’s draft proposals for the next Research funding framework (2014-2020) fail to address the real challenges faced by European societies and call for a research agenda geared towards the needs of society and the environment rather than those of big business.

Today, the European Commission unveiled its post-2013 budget proposal, the Multiannual Financial Framework, which envisages a massive boost for the EU’s next research funding programme. This new programme is expected to have an about €100 billion budget, about twice as much as the current framework programme (FP7) running until 2013.

But increasing a budget and improving a political strategy are two different things.

The signatories, an alliance of researchers (Scientists for Global Responsibility, European Network for Scientists for Social and Environmental Responsibility, Estonian University of Life sciences…) and civil society organisations (The European Consumers´ Organisation, Friends of the Earth Europe, Fondation Sciences Citoyennes, Statewatch, Women in Europe for a Common Future…) caution that the EU’s current excessive emphasis on market competitiveness could see commercially-driven investigations prioritised over needs- and curiosity-driven research in the next Common Strategic Framework.

(Quote from letter) “Research agendas that prioritize profit and market share are incapable of meeting the social and environmental challenges Europe is facing precisely because these challenges require alternatives to the high-growth, high-profit models of economic development”.

The Commission’s proposal would aggravate the already excessive corporate bias in the EU’s current ‘FP7’ research programme, which has seen large companies and their lobbyists shape the EU research agenda and then secure the public funds on offer.

The issue is absolutely strategic. Adequately addressing social, economic and ecological injustice, loss of biodiversity, climate change, resource scarcity, the need to move towards a low-carbon society, public health issues etc. requires a significant shift of current European R&I policies away from a corporate-driven focus on competitiveness. Now more than ever, public research and innovation are needed to create knowledge and tangible solutions to the challenges Europe is facing. Letting corporate interests hijack this effort would be a cruel failure for the EU, and an unacceptable waste of public funds in the midst of an acute financial crisis.

(Quote from letter) “Research that will make Europe (and the world) an environmentally sustainable, healthy and peaceful place to live must now be prioritised over and above research that delivers marketable technologies.” [1]

With five key recommendations, the signatories call on the EU to:

· Overcome the myth that only complex, cost-intensive technologies can create employment and well-being;
· Adopt a wider definition of innovation to include locally adapted, socially relevant research projects;
· Establish a democratic, participatory and accountable decision-making process for research funding allocation, free from conflicts of interest and industry dominance;
· Base decisions on expertise independent from commercial interests, and from a balanced representation of all stakeholders;
· Ensure that the results of publicly funded research will be openly accessible to the wider society.

Link to the Joint Open Letter on the Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding: http://haieurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/29-June-2011-Joint-Open-Letter-Common-Strategic-Framework.pdf

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963