corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19343

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Cronin Fisk M, Feeley J
AstraZeneca to Pay $68.5 Million to U.S. States Over Seroquel Marketing
Bloomberg News 2011 Mar 11
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-10/astrazeneca-to-pay-68-5-million-to-states-over-seroquel-marketing-claims.html


Full text:

AstraZeneca Plc (AZN) agreed to pay $68.5 million to 37 U.S. states and the District of Columbia to resolve allegations that the company deceptively marketed its anti-psychotic drug Seroquel.

The settlement, announced today, is separate from a $520 million agreement London-based AstraZeneca reached with the U.S. last year over the marketing of Seroquel, said Tony Jewell, a company spokesman.

“While we deny the allegations, AstraZeneca believes it is important to bring these matters to a close and move forward with our business of providing medicines to patients,” Jewell said. The company intends to “vigorously defend ourselves” in remaining lawsuits, he said.

AstraZeneca didn’t admit wrongdoing, and the settlement doesn’t resolve lawsuits brought by about seven states, including South Carolina and Mississippi, Jewell said today in an interview.

The company marketed Seroquel for uses that weren’t approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the federal and state governments claimed. AstraZeneca promoted the drug, approved for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, for dementia, depression and anxiety in violation of federal drug rules, according to the states.

While doctors can prescribe medicines for other diseases, companies aren’t allowed to market drugs beyond approved uses.

Side Effects

The states also claimed AstraZeneca failed to adequately disclose Seroquel’s side effects, minimizing the risk of high blood sugar and diabetes.

The office of New Jersey Attorney General Paula Dow announced the settlement.

“This case sends a message that we take seriously the duty pharmaceutical companies have to supply clear, accurate and complete information about their products to health care providers, and to market their products without deception or misleading claims,” Dow said in a statement.

In addition to paying the $68.5 million, AstraZeneca officials agreed to ban financial incentives tied to off-label marketing, instruct salespeople not to market Seroquel to doctors who are unlikely to prescribe it for an approved use, and post payments to doctors on a website, according to the statement.

The settlement provides payments to individual states including $5.2 million to California, $3.8 million to Texas, $3.1 million to New York, $2.6 million to Ohio, $1.85 million to New Jersey and $1.4 million to Colorado, according to attorneys general in those states.

The New Jersey lawsuit is Dow v. AstraZeneca, MER-C-24-11, New Jersey Superior Court, Mercer County (Trenton).

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909