Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19164

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.


Publication type: Journal Article

Rodwin MA
Drug advertising, continuing medical education, and physician prescribing: a historical review and reform proposal
J Law Med Ethics 2010 Dec; 38:(4):807-15


Through the 1960s, many people
claimed that drug advertising was
educational and physicians often
relied on it. Continuing Medical
Education (CME) was developed to
provide an alternative. However,
because CME relied on grants,
industry funders chose the subjects
offered. Now policymakers worry that
drug firms support CME to promote
sales and that commercial support
biases prescribing and fosters
inappropriate drug use. A historical
review reveals parallel problems
between advertising and
industry-funded CME. To preclude
industry influence and improve CME,
we should ensure independent funding
by taxing medical industries,
facilities and physicians.
Independent public and professional
authorities should create CME
curricula. An independent agency
should allocate all funds to
educational institutions for
approved curricula.


  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Click to Register

(read more)

Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts

If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend