corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16894

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
Study Showing Drug Ads Are Linked to Higher Prices Has Flaws
BNet 2009 Nov 24
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005489/study-showing-drug-ads-are-linked-to-higher-prices-has-flaws/


Full text:

A new study of direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertising says that spending on promotion may be associated with increases in drug prices. The study reopens the debate about whether DTC actually works, and if so whether it affects drug prices. More importantly, the study’s limitations underscores the need for a large, comprehensive study on whether DTC affects drug prices – something that has never been done.

The latest study, published in the Archives of Internal medicine by Michael Law of the University of British Columbia in Canada, looked at Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)’s Plavix, a blood thinner:

There was no DTCA for clopidogrel from 1999 to 2000. From 2001 to 2005, U.S. spending on DTCA for clopidogrel exceeded $350 million, an average of $70 million per year.

Clopidogrel use in the 27 Medicaid programs did not change after DTCA. However, cost per unit per quarter increased by $0.40 (12 percent) after DTCA for the drug began, leading to an added $40.58 in pharmacy costs per 1,000 Medicaid enrollees per quarter. “Overall, this change resulted in an additional $207 million in total pharmacy expenditures,” the authors write.

Not everyone buys the idea that $207 million in tax money was wasted because BMS’s ads pushed up the price of Plavix. Internet Drug News pointed out there were lots of price increases across all drug categories in that time period:

This study’s conclusion pivots on the fact that there was a cost increase in Plavix because that’s when certain DTC campaigns started; but it is not beyond the realm of possibility that there are a myriad of reasons Plavix and other drugs were forced to raise prices in 2001.

In fact, a larger study of five drug categories by Villanova School of Business and IMS Health found there was no effect between DTC and drug prices. A Harvard study (also by Law) found that DTC doesn’t even work in terms of spurring demand, as did this anecdotal look. Both those articles only looked at a small group of drugs.

There is only one conclusion to be drawn from all this: Studying one drug, or a small group of drugs, is not good enough if you want to draw conclusions about how DTC affects demand and pricing. There needs to be a study of a large number of well-advertised drugs across several years.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








What these howls of outrage and hurt amount to is that the medical profession is distressed to find its high opinion of itself not shared by writers of [prescription] drug advertising. It would be a great step forward if doctors stopped bemoaning this attack on their professional maturity and began recognizing how thoroughly justified it is.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963