Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16757
Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.
 
Publication type: Journal Article
Hsu JL, Banerjee D, Kuschner WG.
Understanding and identifying bias and confounding in the medical literature.
South Med J 2008 Dec; 101:(12):1240-5
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005435
Abstract:
Bias and confounding are types of error that may be encountered in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of research data. Bias and confounding may result in erroneous research conclusions with adverse consequences for patients and health care providers. In this article, we provide clinician-friendly descriptions and examples of bias (including surveillance, information, selection, lead, length, and publication) and confounding. The purpose of the article is to help clinicians to recognize two important sources of error in research and in turn to help clinicians to assess the validity and generalizability of a research report.
Keywords:
Bias (Epidemiology)
Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data*
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Data Collection/statistics & numerical data
Humans
Publication Bias