corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 10983

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Biles D, Howlett P, Hughes R.
Journals and drug advertising: Medical schools, take the lead
BMJ 2007 Jul 28; 335:(7612):172
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/335/7612/172-a


Abstract:

It is not only journal editors who need to take leadership in changing the culture of acceptance of drug advertising 1,2 : medical schools also need to recognise their responsibility.

Medical schools are to be commended for integrating many of the principles of evidence based medicine into their curriculums. However, when it comes to teaching about the ethics of marketing there is much to be done: to our knowledge, no British medical school has a policy on pharmaceutical interaction.

Our American counterparts are setting the standard: Yale, Stanford, and many other American medical schools have policies restricting pharmaceutical interaction during medical school.3 Their policies reflect the value of marketing representatives as a source of evidence.

The BMA’s recent annual representatives’ meeting signalled the beginnings of a cultural shift in the United Kingdom. The meeting voted almost unanimously in favour of supporting medical schools in not only forming policies but dedicating time . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909